WebAug 28, · Capital Punishment Essay Example Introduction of Capital punishment Essay. The criminals who are committing serious crimes like transferring the secret WebJan 11, · In conclusion, it is worth siding with the view that capital punishment is justified. What is particularly appealing about capital punishment is that it is justified WebConclusion from Research For the most part the death penalty is a good idea logically. The cost of prison institutions go down, and less crimes are commited due to humans
Abolition of Capital Punishment | Free Essay Example
This paper will look at the capital punishment as it applies to cost, deterrence, and the innocence of the accused. It will discuss these issues as it applies to the overall benefit of abolishing the death penalty all together. It would also discuss and evaluate large scale violations of human rights and liberties. Capital punishment violates human rights and therefore cannot be justified for any reason. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, every human has the inalienable right to life and the right not to be tortured or subjected to any cruel, capital punishment essay conclusion, inhuman or degrading punishment.
The death penalty is not always smooth and painless, and therefore it is torture, capital punishment essay conclusion. Every legal system is fallible, and it would therefore be very possible for innocent lives to be extinguished. The death penalty can be unfairly administered to the poor and minorities. The death penalty does nothing to improve society as it takes away any chance of rehabilitation and redemption. The death of a criminal is not for humans to decide, and will only serve as revenge for the victims, not justice. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has the inalienable right to life1. It is a clear capital punishment essay conclusion of this right if the death penalty is used. This right cannot be forfeited even by committing a crime.
The death penalty only serves the purpose of revenge, not justice. However, the purpose of the legal system is not to deal out revenge, but justice, capital punishment essay conclusion. The death penalty is just state-sanctioned murder and revenge. They are also inhumane; prisoners are faced with the humiliation of being executed by firing squad in front of the public and their relatives are not told until after the execution. Capital punishment violates human rights because as they are created by humans, all legal systems are fallible. It is extremely unwise to have the death penalty because there is always the possibility of error. It is unacceptable that even one innocent person could be executed. Where the presumption of innocence holds true, a guilty man walking free should be preferred to an innocent man being wrongfully convicted.
Sincedeath-row prisoners in America have been released due to evidence proving their innocence. In Vietnam the trial process does not meet international standards. Furthermore, the use of capital punishment capital punishment essay conclusion various aspects of human rights. After World War II the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including the right to live. Therefore, as the USA capital punishment essay conclusion a pioneer country of the United Nations, the government should consider the existence of the death penalty as a contradiction to the United Nations objectives. Consequently, the abolitionist movement has increased over the past years, monitored by the United Nations.
The USA should also join the abolitionist countries because the existence of capital punishment continues to set it apart from the United Nations, capital punishment essay conclusion. In addition to that, there are certain human rights violations in the death penalty system itself. Additionally, it is not clear whether the USA Constitution allows. If capital punishment was abolished and replaced by other alternative, capital punishment essay conclusion, such as live imprisonment, which is cheaper than the execution process, 5 both sides would benefit of even lower homicide rates.
In addition to that, people would feel secure that nothing could take away the most important inherent right-to live. In Aprilthe American Civil Liberties Union ACLUafter wrestling with the problem for several years, revised its position on capital punishment and introduced its new policy with these words:. We believe that past decisions to the contrary are in error, and we will seek the repeal of existing laws imposing the death penalty, and will seek reversal of convictions carrying a sentence of death. This policy statement is significant primarily because it comes from the one national organization devoted to interpreting and securing enforcement of the Bill of Rights as a living force in American life. If the ACLU thinks capital punishment is unconstitutional, capital punishment essay conclusion, perhaps it is.
This is unprecedented recognition by the courts of the possible conflict between civil liberties and capital punishment. In cases where the penalty has been carried out, and where post-conviction proceedings would prove the conviction improper, capital punishment denies the fundamental remedy that is still available to those in prison: release and in some cases exoneration and indemnification. Very incomplete records indicate that there is, on the average, one case every other year in the United States involving someone who was convicted of a capital crime but not executed and who either vindicates his innocence and is freed or at least establishes the unfairness of his conviction. The occasional obiter dicta of earlier years on behalf of the death penalty are hardly sufficient today.
They are not even squarely in point, since in no case to date has the Court been faced directly with the issue of capital punishment as such and its alleged unusual cruelty. Furthermore, after decades of relative restraint on any capital punishment essay conclusion of issues touching basic rights expressly and by implication guaranteed to an under the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, the courts have acted to restore what legislatures, administrative agencies, and other arms of executive power have ignored or denied. As in most legislative policies affecting civil liberties and civil rights, there are limits to what even the most enlightened appellate courts can do when left adrift by the other branches of government.
On the matter of capital punishment, those limits may have been reached, at least for the moment, in Gregg and Woodson. The codification of morality on the death penalty began back in when the U, capital punishment essay conclusion. Since the Declaration members of the U. have abolished the death penalty. Because the Declaration was a non-binding treaty, many nations felt that other capital punishment essay conclusion would capital punishment essay conclusion no motivation to follow it. In the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted. It now has ratifications.
In the Covenant there is a strong suggestion that all U. To put added moral pressure on elites the Covenant also created a Human Rights Committee to check on how states are implementing the Covenant. This addition capital punishment essay conclusion only allow the death penalty in times of war. The agreement also requires states that sign it to submit reports to the Human Rights Committee on how they are implementing the agreement. In addition to the agreement, the U. Commission On Human Rights has appointed a Special Rapporteur on the usage of the death penalty around the world. Capital punishment essay conclusion findings of the Special Rapporteur are picked up by the media elite who then shine a media spotlight on those elites that are outside the standards of the codified morality.
These elites who are educated and well off, meet regularly at the UN, international gatherings and private meetings and are increasingly scrutinized at the media at press conferences. Again the pressure on the egos of these elites to be thought of in a positive light, especially on the issue of capital punishment essay conclusion death penalty is growing. In an era of mass communications national elites are more aware of their place in the world and how the rest of the world views them. For example, capital punishment essay conclusion nine former top U. S Foreign Service officers made a special presentation before the U. Supreme Court calling for an end to the death penalty, in part because of the increasing political isolation of the U.
In the U. Supreme Court opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, the court acknowledged the importance of international opinion and agreements in setting the standards of morality. In terms of the issue of morality, elites are also feeling pressure from religious elites to abolish the death penalty. Most members of the Catholic Church want the death penalty, but the elites that control the church are against it. Not only do religious elites pressure other religious elites, but they actively push the issue with non- religious elites as well. For example the former Pope had numerous meetings with foreign elites and capital punishment essay conclusion pressured them to abolish the death penalty in their country.
In January of on a visit to St. Capital Punishment is morally wrong and sometimes dangerously mistaken. Imagine capital punishment essay conclusion are sitting in the front row of a small room, seated in a chair designed for comfort, looking through the small window and watching as capital punishment essay conclusion strap your brother to the metal table. Your mother, beside you, is crying hysterically while your sister attempts to comfort her. You watch with sad eyes, as your brother dies alone on that metal slab. You look away, unable to watch anymore, but instead see the woman behind you smile capital punishment essay conclusion your brother is murdered, capital punishment essay conclusion, and you feel sick to your stomach at this madness.
Has this new death actually righted a wrong? Capital Punishment is unjust and the US should abolish it. In addition to morality, another reason for the sudden international increase in momentum towards abolishing the death penalty is the increasing perception that the death penalty is barbaric and uncivilized, capital punishment essay conclusion. there have been a number of cases where in electrocutions the person was smoking and shaking for more than 30 minutes and the person was still alive. With hangings prisoners have been decapitated and some have had to be hung several times.
Because of international pressure the courts have continually stepped in to capital punishment essay conclusion what crimes can be considered for the death penalty, capital punishment essay conclusion. The U. is one of the few countries in the world that still has teen executions. The international political, religious and media elites have put continuous pressure on the U. to stop executing teenagers. Under this pressure the U. Supreme Court finally gave in an abolished at the end of the death penalty for those who commit crimes before they turn. By attacking individual cases the pressure of world elites has reduced the possible uses of the death penalty to a very few cases.
If the trend continues the death penalty may eventually disappear in all cases. This is all taking place at a time when the masses of the world still support the use of the death penalty. The judicial process in the U. has been the subject of many attacks by the international community and at home for alleged problems with blacks, the poor and other disadvantaged groups getting a fair trial. But the issue that is really putting pressure on political and judicial elites to reconsider the death penalty is the problem of wrongful convictions. It is on this foundation that several anti-capital punishment activists convince for their perspective, by asserting that the government blatantly disregards the sacredness of human life by prohibiting the criminals their admitted and recognized right to live.
Furthermore, there are also those who maintain that the capital punishment is duplicitous because whereas it sends out a message that assassination is a crime that should be considered damned and must be reproached; the government is doing specifically what it denounces by executing the criminal, capital punishment essay conclusion. Yet, others bring out the apparent vainness of executing criminals; they advocate clemency and peace, and scorn the capital punishment for its ostensible emphasis on retribution. There is very little valid evidence to suggest that capital punishment deters criminals.
Some emotionally ill people would see death as the only route to freedom, capital punishment essay conclusion, so the death penalty does not deter them at all.
How Death Penalty is Given in Different Countries
, time: 5:17Capital Punishment Essay Example | Death Penalty Essay Sample
WebMy Conclusion. In my opinion, after analysing the arguments for and against capital punishment, I have concluded that the death penalty is morally right to a considerable WebEssay About Capital Punishment Capital punishment is a death penalty that is put into impact for significant wrongdoings. Capital punishment is an exceptionally dubious WebMar 3, · When capital punishment was in action, there were ideas that, the possibility of punishment by death would act as a deterrent for criminals. But, as human lives were
No comments:
Post a Comment